Legal Opinion
Pollock v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 12, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00191Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION DAVID POLLOCK, Plaintiff, No. 3:23-cv-00191-IM v. OPINION AND ORDER AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendants. IMMERGUT, J., Plaintiff David Pollock brings claims for breach of contract and declaratory judgment against Defendant Amica Mutual Insurance Company. Notice of Removal [ECF 1] Ex. 3 (“Compl.”), at 8–9. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant wrongfully refused to indemnify and defend him against claims brought by the City of Portland after a landslide originating on Plaintiff’s property caused damage to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Godofredo Hernandez v. Spacelabs Medical Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ledford v. GutoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.