Legal Opinion

Central National Bank v. Fort Ann Woolen Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeals from orders denying motions to set aside various attachments granted in each of the above entitled actions.

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed on opinion of the Court below, with costs and disbursements in each case.

All concur.

*317The opinion of Mr. Justice Fursman in the court below, is as follows:

Fursman, J.

This motion is made solely upon the papers on which the plaintiff’s attachment was originally granted, and various objections are urged to the sufficiency of such papers. The first is that the affidavit of Mr. Warren (President of the plaintiff) does not state the indebtedness of defendants to the bank to be over and above all counter-claims known to the plaintiff, as required by Section 636 of the Code of Civil…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steuben County Bank v. . AlbergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Manufacturers' National Bank v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Essex County National Bank v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hodgman v. BarkerNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. E. W. Bliss Co. v. Opera-Glass Supply Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Hellwig v. SeeleyNew York Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API