Legal Opinion

Hellwig v. Seeley

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1919Published

Motion by a junior attaching creditor to vacate a senior warrant of attachment.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

This is a motion, under section 682 of the Code of Civil Procedure, by a junior attaching creditor to vacate a senior warrant of attachment. It is a well-established rule that in order to succeed in. such a motion it must appear that the papers upon which the subsequent attachment was issued were themselves sufficient. Dayton v. McElwee Mfg. Co., 19 N. Y. Supp. 46; Ladenburg v. Commercial Bank, 2 App. Div. 477; Central National Bank v. Ft. Ann Woolen Co., 24 N. Y. Supp. 640; affd. on opinion below, 76 Hun, 610; Corn Exchange Bank v. Marckwald, 57 N. Y. Supp. 458. The subsequent attaching…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ladenburg v. Commercial Bank of NewfoundlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Central National Bank v. Fort Ann Woolen Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Central National Bank v. Ft. Ann Woolen Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Corn Exchange Bank v. MarckwaldNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Dayton v. McElwee Manuf'g Co.New York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API