First National Bank v. Wallace
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Norman B. Squires and others, judgment creditors of the defendants, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Columbia Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Rensselaer on the 24th day of July, 1895, denying their motion to vacate an attachment against the defendants’ property obtained by the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
Parker, P. J.:
The defendants are co-partners, doing business under the firm name of “Wallace, Jones & Ely,” and the plaintiff "claims that as such they are indebted to it in the sum of $23,000 and upwards. It also claims that the defendants have disposed of their property with the intent to defraud their creditors, and on that ground it has procured and caused to be levied an attachment against their property. The attachment recites that the defendants are co-partners, and that “ they have assigned, disposed of and secreted their and its property with intent to defraud its and their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morris v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Ladenburg v. Commercial BankNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Haebler v. . BernharthNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Buell v. . Van CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- National Broadway Bank v. BarkerNew York Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hunt v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Shuler v. Birdsall, Waite & Perry Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Acker, Merrall & Condit v. SaynischCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898
- Breakstone Bros. Bronx Branch, Inc. v. HymanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
- In re the Examination of the First National Bank of EarlvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.