Legal Opinion

United States Gypsum Co. v. State Board of Equalization

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1944No. 8489PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

This is an appeal from a judgment restraining the collection of an item of license tax imposed on the business of manufacturing gypsum products. Plaintiff owns and operates a gypsum plant at Heath, Montana, where it mines gypsum and manufactures various products therefrom. The tax item in controversy is sought to be collected under the provisions of Chapter 213 of the Revised Codes, known as the Cement Producers’ License Tax, Code sections numbers 2356 to 2366.

It is therein provided that: “Every person engaged in or carrying on the business of producing or manufacturing cement, cement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. City of Louisville v. Ewing Von-Allmen Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. State ex rel. Bennett v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Burlington Northern Inc. v. FlathMontana Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API