Legal Opinion

People v. Coolidge

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1997No. 96CA1108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MARQUEZ.

Defendant, Theodore Keith Coolidge, appeals the judgment of conviction entered upon his plea of guilty to first degree kidnapping and one count under the violent crime sentencing statute. Defendant contends that his conviction is barred by principles of double jeopardy because the People had brought a prior civil forfeiture action, based on these charges, seeking forfeiture of his home under § 16-13-303(l)(i), C.R.S.1997. He also contends that imposition of a prison sentence of twenty years, following the forfeiture of his home, constitutes excessive punishment. We…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MayesColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Wolford v. Pinnacol AssuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API