Legal Opinion

Estes v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 16, 1993No. 1—92—0552PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Egan

This is an appeal by the defendant, South Holland Trust and Savings Bank (South Holland), from an order denying the defendant’s motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction granted in favor of the plaintiffs. We granted the defendant, Carol Smith, a nonlawyer, leave to intervene pro se as an appellant.

The plaintiffs are Limmie Estes, Ellen Clark, Beatrice Jackson, executrix of the estate of Wardell Jackson, and Clark, Estes and Jackson, an Hlinois partnership. On January 22, 1986, Estes, Clark and Wardell Jackson, individually and as members of a partnership, entered into an oral agreement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. SpeakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Launius v. NajmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Carriage Way Apartments v. PojmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Sciarabba v. Chrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Maas v. Cohen Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hubble v. O'CONNORAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. Bunzl Retail Services, LLC v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  3. Bunzl Retail Services, LLC v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  4. Hubble v. O'ConnorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API