Legal Opinion

Duchein v. Lindsay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant is an artist who creates and peddles his works upon the streets of this city. He seeks in this proceeding to have declared unconstitutional rules and regulations 13 through 16 of the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, relating to licensed peddlers, as well as an injunction against their enforcement. Special Term granted defendant-respondent city’s motion for summary judgment, declaring the regulations constitutionally valid, and denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The appeal is from the judgment entered on that decision and order. The main thrust of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Good Humor Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Decker v. GoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kleiber v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Big Apple Food Vendors' Ass'n v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. MilbryCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988
  4. Italiano v. Town & Village of HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Barr v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API