Legal Opinion

Acme Fast Freight, Inc v. United States

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 16, 1953No. Civ. A. 1526PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

This is an action brought by freight forwarders 1 subject to Part IV of the Interstate Commerce Act to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission which granted an amended permit to Arrow Marine Forwarders, a partnership.

Arrow’s original permit to act as a freight forwarder was granted by the Commission in 1947. This permit authorized Arrow to act as a freight forwarder of commodities generally between certain states on or near the eastern seaboard 2 to points in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon and Washington “over routes embracing common carriers by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. United States v. Chicago Heights Trucking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. AW SCHAFFER v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1956
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1963
  3. Cardinale Trucking Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
  4. Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1956
  5. Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API