Marriage of Buhr v. Buhr
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Janice Buhr appeals from the property division and maintenance provisions of her dissolution decree. She argues that the trial court abused its discretion in dividing the parties’ property and in awarding maintenance for only four years. Respondent Larry Buhr filed a notice of review, seeking to reverse the award of maintenance. We affirm.
FACTS
The parties were married on June 11, 1961. They have two children, both of whom are now adults. The Buhrs separated on April 1, 1984, and a temporary hearing was held on September 18, 1985. In the interim, the parties had…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marriage of Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Krick v. KrickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Stevens v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Marriage of Elwell v. ElwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Plaster v. PlasterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marriage of Koenen v. KoenenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987