Legal Opinion

State v. Holdcroft

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2013No. 2012-1325 and 2012-1441PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we must again consider when a trial court has the authority to correct a sentence when one of the sanctions originally imposed by the trial court is void. We hold that a trial court cannot add a term of postrelease control as a sanction for a particular offense after the defendant has already served the prison term for that offense, even if the defendant remains in prison for other offenses.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

{¶ 2} On July 29, 1999, the Wyandot County Court of Common Pleas entered a judgment finding appellant, Henry Allen Holdcroft, guilty of aggravated arson and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. State v. Williams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Michael Stansell v.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. State v. Hudson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. ColemanOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. FerrellOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API