Rutter v. Louis Dreyfus Corporation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, District Judge.
The instant matter is before the Court on defendants’ motions to set aside service of the summons and complaint and to dismiss the action. Briefly stated, the defendants contend that service of process upon States Marine-Isthmian Agency, Inc. (“Isthmian”), and a subsequent service of process under the provisions of the Pennsylvania Nonresident Motorist Act, 75 P.S. § 1201, were ineffective to confer jurisdiction over them.
Plaintiff longshoreman, a Pennsylvania citizen, instituted the present action on November 5, 1958. Alleging unseaworthiness of the ship and negligence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holland v. Parry Nav. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Novitski v. Lykes Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Thompson v. Trent Maritime CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Higgins v. California Tanker Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Wade v. RomanoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gottlieb v. Sandia American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Gkiafis v. Steamship YiosonasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Gkiafis v. Steamship YiosonasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Gkiafis v. Steamship YiosonasDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Wingert v. Navarie Aznar, S. A. BilbaoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.