United States v. Purdy
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT [DOC. 67]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Defendant Purdy moves to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that the grand jury which indicted him, N-95-1, was selected in violation of the Sixth Amendment, the Jury Selection and Service Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1861 et seq., and the Fifth Amendment. Specifically, the defendant contends that the system by which the grand jury was selected resulted in the underrepresentation of Blacks and Hispanies in violation of constitutional and statutory requirements. Hearings on the motion were held on February…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Smith v. BerghuisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Omotosho v. Giant Eagle, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- United States v. HsiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.