Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jerry Frazier, a Minor, by His Next Friend, T. L. Frazier, and T. L. Frazier v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1969No. 18492Published

1DissentPhillips, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The facts as found by the District Court establish that the Forest Service asked Nabors to accept a transfer to Cleveland, Tennessee. The Forest Service obviously considered that it would be to its benefit for Nabors to work in Cleveland, rather than Jackson, Mississippi. Otherwise Nabors would not have been asked to accept the transfer and to agree to continue his employment with the Service for at least one additional year. In my opinion this situation is analogous to those cases cited in the opinion of the District Court involving the transfer of military personnel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Freeman Taylor, United States of America v. Homer L. DemossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  2. Kinnard v. Rock City Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  3. Baskin & Cole v. WhitsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  4. Frazier v. NaborsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
  5. Sibyl I. McCluggage v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API