Legal Opinion

Balestrieri v. Sullivan

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1956No. Civ. No. 16594PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court made after judgment, under the provisions of section 949, Code of Civil Procedure, requiring appellants to furnish an undertaking in the sum of $5,000 to stay the enforcement of a mandatory injunction to remove a fence. Respondents’ notice of motion stated that it was made “pursuant to the discretion given said court for such purpose by Section 949 of the Code of Civil Procedure . . . and upon the ground that the real property of said plaintiffs has suffered, is now suffering, and will continue to suffer irreparable damage and injury during…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Jensen v. Hugh Evans & Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Neusted v. SkernswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. May v. MayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API