Legal Opinion

Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. Basham

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 6, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-31; Court 06-00191PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARZILAY, Judge.

Plaintiffs Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance, Native Fish Society, and Clark-Skamania Flyfishers (collectively “Plaintiffs”) have moved for judgment on the agency record, pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 (2000), et seq., the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 551-706 (2000), and USCIT Rule 56.1, to challenge Defendants’ 1 failure to perform ESA-mandated duties in connection with the importation of threatened and endangered 2 salmon from Canada into the United States. Specifically, Plaintiffs aver 1) that Defendants have…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. United States Customs & Border ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. Salmon Spawning and Recovery Alliance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  3. Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  4. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API