Legal Opinion

North Dakota Wheat Commission v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 29, 2004No. 1:96-s-01723PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARZILAY, Judge.

In this case, the court is called upon to decide whether plaintiffs, the North Dakota Wheat Commission, U.S. Durum Growers Association, and Durum Growers Trade Action Committee (“plaintiffs”) have failed to establish jurisdiction in this court as defendant, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”), argues in its motion to dismiss. Specifically, the government argues that the North Dakota Wheat Commission commenced the present action 1 during a time expressly prohibited by section 516a(a)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(5)).

I.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ontario Forest Industries Assoc v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  2. Desert Glory, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  3. All Tools, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  4. American Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API