Legal Opinion

Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 20, 2004No. 1020911 and 1021032PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Liberty National Life Insurance Company ("Liberty National") appeals from the denial of its posttrial motions for a judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial in an action brought by Charles Ingram alleging, among other things, fraud and suppression. Liberty National also appeals the trial court's remittitur of the compensatory damages and the punitive damages, arguing that the trial court erred when it failed to remit the jury's $200,000 compensatory-damages award to an amount less than $60,000, and when it failed to reduce the jury's $3,000,000 punitive-damages award to an amount less…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Torres v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Hicks v. Globe Life and Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. AmerUs Life Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Sandoz, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  3. Baker v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Maloof v. John Hancock Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Hawk v. Roger Watts Ins. AgencyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API