Legal Opinion

Baker v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 14, 2005No. 1031803PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burt F. Baker appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court in favor of defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MetLife") and Gary Baldridge. We affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural History

In October 1989, Baker purchased a whole-life insurance policy from MetLife. In his complaint, Baker alleges that Baldridge, MetLife's agent who sold Baker the policy, represented to Baker that after he paid the annual premium on the policy for 11 years, the policy would become self-sufficient and that he would not have to pay any additional out-of-pocket premiums. In this sort…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Torres v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Ex Parte Alfa Mut. General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. AmerUs Life Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Cox Nuclear Pharmacy, Inc. v. CTI, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Sandoz, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  4. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  5. Maloof v. John Hancock Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API