AmerUs Life Insurance Co. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
LYONS, Justice.
AmerUs Life Insurance Company appeals from the trial court’s order denying its postjudgment motion for a judgment as a matter of law (“JML”), a new trial, or a *1202remittitur. The trial court refused to set aside or modify a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Bobby Ray Smith; Martha Smith, as trustee of the Bobby Ray Smith Family Trust;1 and Precision Husky Corporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “the insureds”). We reverse and render a JML in favor of Ame-rUs.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
In 1987, Carl Edward Jeffrey, an agent for Central Life…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Carter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Buckentin v. Suntrust Mortgage Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013
- Alfa Life Insurance Corp. v. ColzaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Target Media Partners Operating Co. v. Specialty Marketing Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Hillery v. Allstate Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2010
- Alfa Life Insurance Corp. v. ReeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.