Legal Opinion

Lea v. Lea

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.

Rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice is improperly and futilely appealed to by the defendant. The complaint does state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and this court has jurisdiction of the subject of the action.

Section 473 of the Civil Practice Act, dealing with declaratory judgments, has been interpreted to mean that the Supreme Court has the authority “ to declare rights and other legal relations on request for such declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be claimed, and such declaration shall have the force of a final judgment.” (James v. Alderton Dock…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Loomis v. LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Baumann v. BaumannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  5. Baumann v. BaumannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hines v. HinesNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. De Mitry v. De MitryNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Engel v. EngelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API