Legal Opinion
Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 1, 1996No. Court No. 93-09-00536PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
I
Introduction
Wallach, Judge:
Plaintiff, Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc. (“Sharp”), challenges the classification of imported glass cells consisting of two pieces of processed glass with a layer of liquid crystal material injected between them (“display glass”) by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”). Customs classified the merchandise as “[ljiquid crystal devices not constituting articles provided for more specifically in other headings * * * Other devices * * * Other” under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) subheading 9013.80.60…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Goodman Manufacturing, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- National Advanced Systems v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- United States v. PorterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Optrex America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2008
- The Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- General Electric Company-Medical Systems Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Verosol USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.