Legal Opinion
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Sedillo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 2, 2000No. 20,876PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} This ease and the related ease of Barncastle v. American National Property and Casualty Cos., 2000-NMCA-095, 129 N.M. 672, 11 P.3d 1234 (2000), provide us with the opportunity to explain when uninsured motorist coverage is available under circumstances in which the use of the vehicle is somewhat attenuated from the incident. Defendant Zeke C. Sedillo appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing his claims seeking uninsured motorist coverage for injuries he suffered after a football game. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
{2} At about 9:30 on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Britt v. Phoenix Indemnity InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Barncastle v. American National Property & Casualty CompaniesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Edmond Blystra Barbara Blystra, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Kevin Blystra, a Minor, and Third-Party v. Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Martin v. West American InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barncastle v. American National Property & Casualty CompaniesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Kropinak v. ARA Health Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hartford Insurance v. Estate of TollardoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
- Miera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kipnis v. JusbascheNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.