Legal Opinion

Brannum v. Lake

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 26, 2005No. 04-5130, 04-5131Published

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

consolidated with 04-5131

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs by the parties. For the reasons presented in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

*815Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

MEMORA…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ali v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  3. Murphy v. DaltonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Robert Vinson Brannum v. William Lake, Brig. Gen., U.S.A.F.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. PhillipsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API