Legal Opinion

Blevins v. Doe

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 2, 2003No. 3:02 CV 7079PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KATZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 28), as to which Plaintiff has filed a response (Doc. No. 39) and Defendant has filed a reply (Doc. No. 52). Plaintiff has also filed another response (Doc. No. 56), as to which Defendant has filed another reply (Doc. No. 58) and Plaintiff has filed an additional response (Doc. No. 60).

This Court has jurisdiction to decide this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion will be denied.

Background

Plaintiff Gareth Blevins…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James Bultema v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Bultema v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API