Legal Opinion

Howsley v. Clark

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1934No. 21896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

On the 28th day of January. 1925, T. W. Vandenburg was the owner and holder of a note secured by a mortgage on a frame building in Hooker, Okla. He was carrying fire insurance on the property with the usual loss payable clause to himself as mortgagee. On the date mentioned C. W. Eerguson, who was representing him as attorney in connection with this delinquent indebtedness, went with him to the office of the defendant in error, E. B. Clark. There the following- conversation took place, as testified to by Ferguson:

“1 said to Clark. ‘It is necessary that this property be insured’ * * * and I…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Yoder Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Board of Com'rs of Logan County v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Ratzlaff v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. American Farm Agency, Inc. v. Investors Management Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Buck Wilcoxon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. McCaw v. HartmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Jayne v. BatemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Henson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API