Legal Opinion
Orrok v. Parmigiani
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 16, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
32 N.J. Super. 70 (1954)
107 A.2d 815
DAVID P. ORROK AND ETHEL ORROK, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
JOHN PARMIGIANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS PARMIE'S AGENCY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 8, 1954.
Decided September 16, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.
Mr. Paul Lustbader argued the cause for appellants.
Mr. Robert M. Kronman argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the County Court, entered on defendant's motion, dismissing their…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cauco v. GalanteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- DeMarco v. EstlowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Carter v. McCallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Feldman v. WarshawskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- State v. Foster Wheeler Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Central RR Co. v. NeeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Presten v. SailerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Schnakenberg v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- P. & J. AUTO BODY v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Brennan v. BiberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.