Legal Opinion
P. & J. AUTO BODY v. Miller
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 5, 1962PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
72 N.J. Super. 207 (1962)
178 A.2d 237
P. & J. AUTO BODY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DAVID T. MILLER, SR., POLICE COMMISSIONER OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 18, 1961.
Decided February 5, 1962.
Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and LEONARD.
Mr. Norman Robbins argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer & Sills, attorneys; Mr. Robbins, of counsel).
Mr. Gordon Berkow argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Hutt & Berkow, attorneys; Mr. Berkow, on the brief).
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- McKenna v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Gallena v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Goldman v. SummerfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Orrok v. ParmigianiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Rieder v. State, Dept. of Transp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Kohler v. BarnesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Matter of Prudential Ins. Co. Litig.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Salt Lake County v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.