Legal Opinion

People v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 18, 2010No. 09PDJ098PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.19(c)

I. ISSUE AND SANCTION

Disbarment is typically appropriate when a lawyer knowingly converts or misappropriates client funds, in the absence of significant mitigating factors. Respondent knowingly failed to return an unearned retainer to a client for whom he had performed little or no work. In addition, Respondent misrepresented to his client that he had been called to military duty when in fact he had been suspended for professional misconduct. The Court must determine the appropriate sanction for Respondent.

Respondent has not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. RichardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. In Re FischerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. In Re ClelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. MatsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. MatsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API