Legal Opinion

Rodda v. Best

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1923No. 5,295PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

The material facts involved in this case are practically undisputed and will be most easily understood by reference to *210the following plat, which is taken from a map introduced in evidence at the trial.

Canyon Creek comes out of the mountains to the north, flowing in a southerly direction to a point near the northeast corner of section 6, township 12 north, range 5 west, where it turns and runs southeasterly across sections 5 and 8. Little Prickly Pear Creek comes in from the west, flowing across the northern part of sections 7 and 8, where the waters of Canyon Creek unite with it. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Norman v. CorbleyMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Thomas v. BallMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Moore v. ShermanMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Cottonwood Ditch Co. v. ThomMontana Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. MacLay v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hochsprung v. StevensonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Shammel v. VoglMontana Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Zosel v. KohrsMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Washington County Irrigation District v. TalboyIdaho Supreme Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API