Legal Opinion

Parus Holdings, Inc. v. Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 9, 2008No. 08 C 1535PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM T. HART, District Judge.

Plaintiff Parus Holdings, Inc. (as the alleged successor-in-interest to Vail Inc.) alleges that defendants Banner & Witcoff, Ltd. (“Banner”), Charles Call, and Eugene Nelson committed legal malpractice, breached their fiduciary duties, and committed trade secret violations by providing non-defendant Robert Swartz with confidential information about Vail’s application for a patent on which Vail was being represented by defendants. Swartz allegedly used this information to submit his own patent application for a similar invention. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Covenant Aviation Security, LLC v. BerryDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  2. Fire 'Em Up, Inc. v. Technocarb Equipment (2004) Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Moffett v. Computer Sciences Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  4. Spitz v. Proven Winners North America, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  5. HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC. v. TELLISENSE MEDICAL, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API