Spitz v. Proven Winners North America, LLC
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM T. HART, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Susan Spitz claims defendants Proven Winners North America, LLC (“PW”) and EuroAmerican Propagators, LLC (“Euro”) contracted with her to use her “Marketing Concept” related to pet-safe plants and thereafter used the Concept, but failed to pay her any fee. In the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), plaintiff describes her Marketing Concept as follows:
74. In brief summary, Ms. Spitz conceived and proposed that a plant cultivation, marketing and distribution company or associated companies, such as for example PW and the PW…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lionel Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zedov v. Mr. Bult's Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020