Legal Opinion

Edward Gregory v. Donald W. Wyrick

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1984No. 83-1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a petition, for habeas corpus filed by a prisoner in state custody. The District Court1 564 F.Supp. 715, dismissed the petition, and we affirm.

Edward Gregory, the petitioner-appellant, claims that his State conviction is invalid because it was based on identification testimony obtained as a result of an arrest that violated the Fourth Amendment. Gregory had a full and fair opportunity to raise this question in the State courts, and they in fact rejected his contention on its merits, holding that even if his arrest was illegal, the identification testimony of which he complains was not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gregory v. WyrickDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roger George Flittie v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Roger George Flittie v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Thomas L. Fitzgerald v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. Edward Gregory v. Donald W. WyrickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. Roger George Flittie v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API