Legal Opinion
United States v. James T. Anderson, Phillip Cordova, and Jon Gerald Salinas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1992No. 91-2238, 91-2247 and 91-2260PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Phillip Cordova, James Anderson, and Jon Salinas appeal their convictions for conspiracy to possess more than 100 kilograms of marijuana with the intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). 1 Mr. Salinas was also convicted of the establishment of manufacturing operations in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856. We conclude that the evidence is insufficient to support Anderson’s convictions. We further conclude that be cause unlawfully obtained…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. John Henry MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- United States v. John Javilo McCullahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Pamela Jones, Katresa Marie Johnson, Mark J. Scott, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Anthony Dean JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. NajarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.