Legal Opinion

Davis v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1937No. Appeal, 54PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

Plaintiff brought an action in trespass to recover damages resulting from a collision between defendant’s street car and a motor hearse owned and driven by plaintiff. At the trial, defendant offered no testimony but submitted a point for binding instructions. The jury found for plaintiff, whereupon defendant filed a motion for judgment n. o. v., which was later granted on the ground of plaintiff’s contributory negligence. From the judgment entered for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Reading the testimony in the light most advantageous to plaintiff and resolving all doubts in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Oakley v. Allegheny CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Goldfine & Brenner, Inc. v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Przybyszewski v. NunesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API