Legal Opinion

Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2007No. 2006-1212PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson, 116 Ohio St.3d 468,

2007-Ohio-6948.] ARBINO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON ET AL. [Cite as Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson, 116 Ohio St.3d 468,

2007-Ohio-6948.] Trials – Damages – R.C. 2315.18 – Cap on noneconomic damages is constitutional and does not violate right to jury, right to due process, right to remedy, right to open court, or right to equal protection – Cap on noneconomic damages does not violate separation of powers – R.C. 2315.21 – Cap on punitive damages is constitutional and does not violate right to jury, right to due process, right to remedy, right to…

2Cases cited120 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brandt v. PompaOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State ex rel. Meyer v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Brandt v. PompaOhio Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API