Legal Opinion

Uddin v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 2006PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Paul Victor, J.), entered *266August 8, 2005, which directed respondent to deliver documents for in camera inspection pursuant to a motion for discovery, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and petitioner’s application seeking pre-action disclosure denied.

Petitioner was waiting on the platform of a subway station when she fell onto the track and under a train, sustaining serious injuries. Her counsel demanded disclosure of the investigative file relating to the accident, and when respondent failed to furnish this information, petitioner moved by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holzman v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Gleich v. KissingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bishop v. Stevenson Common Assoc., L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re CohenNew York Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Matter of Camara v. Skanska, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Culligan Soft Water Co. v. Clayton Dubilier & Rice, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API