Legal Opinion
Culligan Soft Water Co. v. Clayton Dubilier & Rice, LLC
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 2017PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jeffrey K. Oing, J.
Plaintiffs move, pursuant to CPLR 3124, for an order requiring defendants Centerbridge Special Credit Partners, LP, CCP Acquisition Holdings, LLC, CCP Credit Acquisition Holdings, LLC, and Culligan Newco, Ltd. (the lender defendants) to respond to plaintiffs’ first request for production of documents served on the lender defendants, and determining that these defendants have waived all objections and privileges by failing to timely assert them, pursuant to CPLR 3122. In the alternative, plaintiffs move, pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c), for an order permitting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holzman v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Uddin v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Culligan Soft Water Co. v. Clayton Dubilier & Rice LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Culligan Soft Water Co. v. Clayton Dubilier & Rice, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
3Cited by2 opinions
- Teamsters Local 404 Health Servs. & Ins. Plan v. King Pharm., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Teamsters Local 404 v. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018