Legal Opinion
Matter of Camara v. Skanska, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 18, 2017No. 4063N 163157/15PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered February 24, 2016, which, to the extent appeal-able, granted petitioner’s application for pre-action disclosure pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c), unanimously modified, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, to delete paragraphs 3 and 4 of the order, which provide for a deposition, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Although respondents have already largely complied with petitioner’s pre-action disclosure requests, respondents still have an ongoing obligation to “amend or supplement” their responses (CPLR 3101 [h]), and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Holzman v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Uddin v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Saratoga Harness Racing, Inc. v. RoemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Stump v. 209 East 56th St. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Delgrange v. RealReal, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- McCurrie v. New York City Animal Care Ctr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- McCurrie v. New York City Animal Care Ctr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Bermudez v. PeuserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019