Legal Opinion

Wright v. B&L Properties, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 16, 2002No. 49386-8-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

— Purchasers of a residential home sued their general contractor for damages. The purchasers’ attempts to serve the contractor personally were unsuccessful. They therefore served him by mail under the substitute service statute, RCW 4.28.080(16). The contractor failed to respond. The superior court entered a default judgment, ordering the contractor to pay $150,000 to the purchasers. The contractor urges this court to vacate that judgment.

The purchasers used reasonable diligence to serve the summons and complaint on the general contractor personally. They were, however, unsuccessful. They…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Martin v. MeierWashington Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wright v. B & L PROPERTIES, INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. GOETTEMOELLER v. TwistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. Goettemoeller v. TwistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Anderson v. RaibleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  5. Grays Harbor Drug Task Force & Grays Harbor County v. Real PropertyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API