Legal Opinion

Klimist v. Bearden

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1964No. 32PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

This is a suit upon a sworn account. In a trial before the court without the intervention of a jury, the trial judge entered judgment for the plaintiff below for the reasonable value of certain art work, newspaper layouts and advertising services performed by the plaintiff, Ed Bearden, for the defendant, Bert Klimist, together with attorney’s fees, to which judgment and ruling of the court defendant has perfected this appeal.

Since the only question involved in this appeal is the alleged error of the trial judge in excluding certain evidence directed to the reasonable value of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Texas Power & Light Co. v. HeringTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Torrey, Davidson & Grosscup v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Gordon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Robinson v. Howard CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Chadwick v. Glens Falls Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barrios v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Coleman v. Pacific Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Continental Trailways, Inc. v. McCandlessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Moore v. Polish Power, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  5. Consolidated Underwriters v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API