Consolidated Underwriters v. Foster
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DUNAGAN, Chief Justice.
This is a Workmen’s Compensation case tried to a jury resulting in a judgment for Melvin L. Foster, Plaintiff in the court below and Appellee here, based on jury verdict for 401 weeks compensation at the maximum rate, with credit for 30 weeks already paid and from such j udgment and the overruling of Defendant’s Amended Motion for a New Trial this appeal has been perfected.
The injuries are alleged to have been sustained by Appellee on or about the 11th day of September, 1962.
Appellant, Consolidated Underwriters, by its first Point of Error, contends the trial court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. SeelbachTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. ArantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Lantex Construction Company v. LejsalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- American General Insurance Company v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. DepoisterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- City of Houston v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- City of Austin v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- City of Austin v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.