Dahnken, Inc. of Salt Lake City v. Wilmarth
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
The defendant, Harold Wilmarth, contests the judgment of the district court which held an assignment of a real estate contract by H.C. Davis to Davis’ stepfather, Harold Wilmarth, to be a fraudulent conveyance and therefore void under the Utah Fraudulent Conveyance Act. 1 Wil-marth alleges three errors by the trial court: (1) that the evidence did not support the trial court’s finding that the assignment was fraudulent pursuant to U.C.A., 1953, § 25-1-4 (1984 ed.) of the Utah Fraudulent Conveyance Act because it was made without fair consideration, 2 (2) that the trial court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hansen v. CramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Walters v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- Palmer v. StokelyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1966
- Bennett v. Rodman & English, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1932
- Givan v. LambethUtah Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by11 opinions
- Baldwin v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Territorial Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Selvage v. J.J. Johnson & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- Cambridge Meridian Group, Inc. v. Connecticut National Bank (In Re Erin Food Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- United States v. ChristensenDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.