Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Rodman & English, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 15, 1932No. 5292, 5293, 5471PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
These are three actions in equity, brought by the trustee in bankruptcy of Froh Homes, Inc., against the several defendants to recover what he alleges to be fraudulent transfers and preferences.
The bill of complaint in the first action is against Louis Bossert So Son, Inc., to recover the sum of $1,523.50, and in the action against Rodman So English, Inc., to recover-the sum of $4,566.80. Each alleges two causes of action: The first cause of action being to set aside certain payments made by the bankrupt to the defendant, on the alleged ground that the payments were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ga Nun v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Lytle v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Marcus v. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Klinger v. HymanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Miceli v. MorganoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rubin v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Hassett v. Weissman (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Hassett v. Far West Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- McColley v. Rosenberg (In Re Candor Diamond Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- United States v. RothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.