Nathan Manuf'g Co. v. Craig
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
In Equity. Bill by the Nathan Manufacturing Company and others against Warren H. Craig and others, for relief against a patent alleged to interfere with complainants’ patent.
1Opinion of the Court
Colt, Circuit Judge.
This bill is brought under section 4918 of the Revised Statutes, which provides that, where there are interfering patents, any person, interested may have relief against the interfering patentee, and all parties interested under him, by suit in equity against the owner of the interfering patent, and the court may adjudge either of the patbnts void in whole or in part. The bill alleges the issue of letters patent 337,500, dated March 9, 1886, to Kaczander and Ruddy, and of the letters patent No. 357,931, dated February 15, 1887, to Kaczander, and that the patents are vested…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Garratt v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Gold & Silver Ore Separating Co. v. United States Disinte-Grating Ore Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1869
3Cited by9 opinions
- International Signal Co. v. Vreeland Apparatus Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Dittgen v. Racine Paper Goods Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1910
- Nagle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Beidler v. Photostat CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Boston Pneumatic Power Co. v. Eureka Patents Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.