Legal Opinion

Wigod v. Janina Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1949Published

1Opinion of the Court

In our *718opinion, a tenant is not entitled to maintain an action under the provisions of subdivision (d) of section 8 of the Business Rent Law where the removal by the tenants results solely from a demand by the landlord to vacate at the expiration of the tenant’s lease. (Joanette Juniors, Inc., v. Board of Home Missions of Cong. & Christian Churches, 298 N. Y. 826; Cleaners Holding Corp. v. Trunz, Inc., 272 App. Div. 825.) However, where the removal is brought about by the fraudulent representations of the landlord, it is immaterial by what method the removal or “ dispossession ” of the tenant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Joanette Juniors, Inc. v. Board of Home Missions of the Congregational & Christian ChurchesNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Tourneur Realty Corp. v. Frank Bros. Footwear, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  3. Vernat, Inc. v. Cross & Brown Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Wigod v. Janina Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API