Legal Opinion

Sundquist v. Lechowick

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 7, 1998No. A080435PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, J.—

I. Introduction

This is an appeal by a “free lance” journalist, appellant Mark Heimann, from a minute order of the Mendocino County Superior Court denying his application to unseal the court records and open any further proceedings to the public in a long-running marital dissolution proceeding in that court, a proceeding in which one of the parties, respondent Vincent T. Lechowick (respondent), is a sitting judge in that county. We reverse and remand.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

The underlying dissolution action was commenced some years ago by Judith Lechowick, who is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trs. of William Randolph Hearst Testamentary Tr. v. LubinskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Braun v. City of TaftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Pantos v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Whitney v. WhitneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Champion v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV), Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Oiye v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. In Re Providian Credit Card CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Ex Parte Capital U-Drive-It, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API