Pantos v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LOW, P. J.
In this case we hold that when the defendant-court completes the compilation of a master list of qualified jurors, whether on tape or in other document form, the list by name and address is a judicial record subject to public inspection and copying. Neither the Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.) 1 nor other law requires defendant to publicly disclose to plaintiff information from a juror’s questionnaire. That information is obtained under representations of confidentiality and is used by the court as working notes and data to determine juror competency,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hovey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.