Legal Opinion

Pantos v. City and County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1984No. AO23419PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

In this case we hold that when the defendant-court completes the compilation of a master list of qualified jurors, whether on tape or in other document form, the list by name and address is a judicial record subject to public inspection and copying. Neither the Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.) 1 nor other law requires defendant to publicly disclose to plaintiff information from a juror’s questionnaire. That information is obtained under representations of confidentiality and is used by the court as working notes and data to determine juror competency,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hovey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API