Legal Opinion
Patricia R. v. Peter W.
New York City Family Court
Decided August 10, 1983PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sara P. Schechter, J.
Respondent in this proceeding to adjudicate paternity of a 16-year-old boy had previously moved to dismiss the proceeding as barred by the Statute of Limitations set forth in subdivision (a) of section 517 of the Family Court Act. Petitioner alleges that respondent has acknowledged paternity by furnishing support for the child, thereby establishing an exception to the Statute of Limitations. Respondent’s motion to dismiss was denied due to “issues of fact * * * which must be resolved at a hearing.” (Decision of Eastman, J., Jan. 26, 1983.)
When the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mills v. HabluetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pickett v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Comiskey v. ArlenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Hopkins v. . Lincoln Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Comiskey v. ArlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Department of Social Services ex rel. Sandra C. v. Thomas J. S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Department of Social Services ex rel. Katherine McL. v. Jay W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Weegar v. BakebergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Patricia R. v. Peter W.New York City Family Court · 1984
- Moore v. McNamaraConnecticut Superior Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.