Legal Opinion
Patricia R. v. Peter W.
New York City Family Court
Decided October 29, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sara P. Schechter, J.
Petitioner’s motion before the court seeks counsel fees and various court costs. Respondent opposes the application for counsel fees but concedes liability for court costs. He requests that such costs as the court may award, however, be held in escrow pending the outcome of his appeal in this matter.
Paternity was adjudicated in this proceeding by order dated January 30, 1984, following a decision declaring the Statute of Limitations (Family Ct Act, § 517, subd [a]) unconstitutional. (Matter of Patricia R. v Peter W., 120 Misc 2d 986.) Support was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Elder v. . RosenwasserNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- In re Cheri H.New York City Family Court · 1983
- Patricia R. v. Peter W.New York City Family Court · 1983
- People v. BellNew York Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Entertainment Partners Group, Inc. v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- Richardson v. ClarkNew York Family Court · 1986
- Cherrez v. LazoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Cherrez v. LazoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.